After the conclusion of the consensus 2025, where the founder of #PI# PI participated in the encryption conference, I have some personal thoughts:

First, a question: why was PI founder Nicholas assigned to the AI group?
In my opinion, Nicholas has explained what PI really is during this conference. To me, PI is not just about mobile mining. He is addressing the issue of BTC's inability to integrate into real-world economies. It is now very clear that no matter how autonomous and free BTC is, it cannot surpass the government.
In simple terms, PI is building a government administration department for the entire cryptocurrency ecosystem, serving as the identity verification for the whole network. The actual decentralization involves removing human management and transitioning to centralized AI management, allowing the cryptocurrency space, which is in a state of anarchy, to truly have managers, and those managers are AI. This way, it can achieve complete transparency, openness, and verifiable compliance, rather than merely believing in the transparency of the areas one is concerned about.
Your secret cash can be transparent to your wife, but does your mistress outside have the same transparency? It’s not that the transparent paper is money, but everything.
In conclusion, it is currently known that a project that PI has surpassed is WLD. What Ultraman has not yet accomplished has already been achieved by Nicholas, and everyone has tokens, and everyone is doing real KYC. WLD is suspected of identity theft, while PI will not, because PI implements decentralized KYC managed by AI, hence the mention of face verification.
Key points:
1. You cannot sell your identity; what you sell is the PI you earned through hard work. Unlike WLD.
2. You cannot steal someone else's identity; your identity in the cryptocurrency space is always yours, and you must independently safeguard the value of your identity.
I believe the focus of the consensus conference on PI is highlighted, as PI is establishing a crypto store, which is an important infrastructure for entering the cryptocurrency space with a real identity, just like APPLE. If you want to participate in the cryptocurrency space, you must establish your real identity, not a virtual one. Moreover, it is not acceptable for any project to create something first and then think of ways to patch up KYC, as this will always lead to issues of false KYC. PI completely addresses this problem, and Nicholas has been emphasizing identity compliance for many years.
Secondly, in terms of price, how to view the price is a question of human behavior for me. The price increase that most people hope for comes from a large amount of unused liquidity. Once activated, the price will rise significantly, which is the key to systematic pricing.
As for whether short-term trading can manipulate prices down, of course it can, as long as you have sufficient expertise in speculation. It is free to deceive short-term speculators. However, prices are ultimately determined systematically; no matter how whales speculate, it does not affect the final price determination after decentralization.
So in the short term, when I see whales wanting to hype and suppress the price, I will announce in advance the time when the whales will suppress.
Most people always view everything in terms of price; is this a valid approach?
Then may I ask, when a couple argues and throws things, how do you judge how long they will argue? If an analyst tells you that he will stop arguing as soon as he throws a computer worth ten thousand, would you say this analyst is XX? If they assess the value of the things they throw before arguing, will they still argue? Then what if they throw a watermelon that someone else is holding, how do you price it?
One might say, how can one use an argument as an example.
This is because you don't think that the main force is speculating on the emotions of retail investors and building a bunch of techniques to try to make you do meaningless analysis. In fact, speculators all know that what they are messing with is your mindset. And you are still using numbers to calculate why your wife is angry. Trust me, you are definitely not as professional as physicist Hawking, who spent his whole life studying calculations and found women’s hearts to be the most complicated. #NXPC Launchpool#