🎉 #Gate xStocks Trading Share# Posting Event Is Ongoing!
📝 Share your trading experience on Gate Square to unlock $1,000 rewards!
🎁 5 top Square creators * $100 Futures Voucher
🎉 Share your post on X – Top 10 posts by views * extra $50
How to Participate:
1️⃣ Follow Gate_Square
2️⃣ Make an original post (at least 20 words) with #Gate xStocks Trading Share#
3️⃣ If you share on Twitter, submit post link here: https://www.gate.com/questionnaire/6854
Note: You may submit the form multiple times. More posts, higher chances to win!
📅 End at: July 9, 16:00 UTC
Show off your trading on Gate Squ
Vitalik's Change of Perspective: Embracing "Permissioned" Governance to Address the New Competitive Era of Open Source and the Risks of Power Concentration
Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin recently stated that he is re-evaluating his long-standing preference for permissive software licenses and advocating for broader adoption of the Copyleft licensing framework. He believes that the open-source ecosystem is entering an era of increased competition and greater centralization.
Copyleft is a concept developed by the free software movement, which is a way of licensing that uses the existing copyright system to protect the freedoms of all users and secondary developers.
In a blog post published on July 7, Buterin explained that historically, he chose permissive licenses like MIT or CC0 because they allow anyone to use, modify, and redistribute the code with minimal restrictions, which is beneficial for broader adoption.
In contrast, copyleft licenses such as GPL or CC-BY-SA require derivative works to be shared under the same terms, including the release of source code, which provides legal protection for openness.
Buterin wrote:
The co-founder of Ethereum has significantly increased his activity in recent months, proposing and researching many new ideas against the backdrop of a shift in priorities.
◉ Protecting Openness: Buterin's Reflections
Buterin stated that his early preferences stemmed from two core ideas:
He believes that relaxed licensing is practically the closest way to "no copyright at all," which aligns with his belief that "sharing data or ideas should never be seen as theft."
However, he now sees three major factors that are changing this consideration:
The third major factor driving Buterin's transformation is rooted in economic theory. Drawing on the views of radical market economist Glen Weyl, he believes that in industries with Superlinear Returns to Scale (such as AI and cloud computing), strict property rights lead to a concentration of power.
He explained that if one participant's resources are double that of another's and can produce more than double the output, this gap will compound over time, ultimately leading to a monopoly.
Buterin warned that these conditions, along with rapid technological advancements and geopolitical instability, are threatening to create a lasting and self-reinforcing power imbalance between companies and states.
He pointed out that some governments have enforced technology diffusion through policies, such as the EU's standardization authorization, China's technology transfer regulations, and the recent non-compete clause ban by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).
◉ Authoritative Rights: Decentralized Technology Dissemination Scheme
Buterin believes that the establishment of copyright has achieved similar technological diffusion goals in a neutral and decentralized manner:
◉ The Way of Balance: Loose Permissions Still Have Value
Buterin acknowledged that when maximizing widespread application is the primary goal, permissive licenses (such as MIT / Apache 2.0) still have their significance and are valuable parts of property rights. This may still be the preferred choice for smart contract libraries or blockchain protocol standards that hope to be widely integrated.
◉ Suggestions for Developers and the Open Source Community
He urged developers and the open source community to recognize that:
The open-source community should seriously consider adopting authorship rights as a mechanism:
At the time of Buterin's remarks, the artificial intelligence (AI) development and blockchain development communities are engaged in heated debates over licensing models. There are concerns that foundational innovations may be dominated by a small group of players. For crypto users focused on a decentralized future and anti-censorship technology, the choice of open-source license directly affects the openness and fairness of the ecosystem.
(Source: CryptoSlate)