📢 Gate Square #MBG Posting Challenge# is Live— Post for MBG Rewards!
Want a share of 1,000 MBG? Get involved now—show your insights and real participation to become an MBG promoter!
💰 20 top posts will each win 50 MBG!
How to Participate:
1️⃣ Research the MBG project
Share your in-depth views on MBG’s fundamentals, community governance, development goals, and tokenomics, etc.
2️⃣ Join and share your real experience
Take part in MBG activities (CandyDrop, Launchpool, or spot trading), and post your screenshots, earnings, or step-by-step tutorials. Content can include profits, beginner-friendl
Recently, a Crypto Assets player encountered a puzzling situation. The user suddenly received a notification that their account had been restricted while normally using the platform. This user stated that he had not engaged in any suspicious operations, such as transfers or using special techniques. He had only received 40u in Airdrop rewards within a cycle.
Many users have reported that the platform may have taken such measures due to the speed of processing limit order four times the points. However, this user believes that this method of operation is common and should not be a reason for the account to be restricted.
This event has sparked widespread discussion in the crypto assets community. Many users are confused and dissatisfied with the platform's sudden actions, believing that the platform should provide clearer rules and more transparent handling methods. At the same time, this also reminds crypto assets participants to always pay attention to changes in platform policies to avoid similar situations.
As the crypto assets industry continues to develop, how to strike a balance between user experience and platform security has become a topic worth exploring in depth.